Toggle Main Menu Toggle Search

Open Access padlockePrints

The Newcastle University research output collection, currently available on ePrints, will shortly be moving to a new open repository platform, Figshare. To prepare for the data migration we have paused adding new content to ePrints, and will resume once the new repository is launched. During this time you will continue to have access to ePrints (but no new content will appear). We will share updates here when available.

A survey of local anaesthetic use among general dental practitioners in the UK attending postgraduate courses on pain control

Lookup NU author(s): Dr Ian Corbett, Juliana Ramacciato, Dr John Meechan

Downloads

Full text for this publication is not currently held within this repository. Alternative links are provided below where available.


Abstract

Objective The aim of this study was to identify which local anaesthetic solutions were used by general dental practitioners in the United Kingdom and to determine selection criteria. In addition, differences in anaesthetic choice between recent graduates (<= 5 years) and more experienced practitioners were investigated. Material and methods Five hundred and six general dental practitioners attending postgraduate courses on pain control in dentistry completed a questionnaire. Participants were asked to indicate year and place of qualification, anaesthetic solutions available in their surgeries and criteria used in the choice of anaesthetic. In addition, the respondents were asked to indicate choice of local anaesthetic in a number of common medical conditions. Questionnaires were distributed and collected immediately prior to the start of the course presentation and participants were not asked to indicate whether the selection decisions were teaching, experience or evidence based. Data were analysed by using the Chi-square test. Results Lidocaine with epinephrine was the most widely available solution among this group of practitioners (94%), the second most common solution was prilocaine with felypressin (74%). The majority of practitioners had two or more solutions available. Practitioners who qualified within the last five years (14%) were more likely to have articaine available, the most recently introduced local anaesthetic into the UK (p = 0.04, one degree of freedom). Common medical conditions lead to a modification in anaesthetic selection: the use of prilocaine/felypressin increases in the majority of circumstances, although it is avoided in pregnant females by recent graduates. Conclusions Lidocaine/epinephrine continues to be the most common anaesthetic solution used by this group of UK general practitioners. The primary criterion for selection of an anaesthetic agent was perceived efficacy. Prilocaine/felypressin is commonly selected as an alternative solution in the presence of common medical conditions.


Publication metadata

Author(s): Corbett IP, Ramacciato JC, Groppo FC, Meechan JG

Publication type: Article

Publication status: Published

Journal: British Dental Journal

Year: 2005

Volume: 199

Issue: 12

Pages: 784-787

ISSN (print): 0007-0610

ISSN (electronic): 1476-5373

Publisher: British Dental Journal

URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4813028

DOI: 10.1038/sj.bdj.4813028


Altmetrics

Altmetrics provided by Altmetric


Share