Toggle Main Menu Toggle Search

Open Access padlockePrints

The Newcastle University research output collection, currently available on ePrints, will shortly be moving to a new open repository platform, Figshare. To prepare for the data migration we have paused adding new content to ePrints, and will resume once the new repository is launched. During this time you will continue to have access to ePrints (but no new content will appear). We will share updates here when available.

European multicenter study on propionyl-L-carnitine in intermittent claudication

Lookup NU author(s): David Lambert

Downloads

Full text for this publication is not currently held within this repository. Alternative links are provided below where available.


Abstract

OBJECTIVES This study was performed to identify a target population of claudicants for propionyl-L-carnitine treatment. BACKGROUND Previous studies suggest that the efficacy of propionyl-L-carnitine in intermittent claudication is greater in patients with severe functional impairment than in those with mild walking disability. METHODS After run-in, 485 claudicant patients were randomized to placebo or propionyl-L-carnitine (1 g bid, po) and then stratified on the basis of maximal walking distance (cutoff point 250 m) and maximal walking distance variability (cutoff Feint 25%). Treatment lasted 12 months. Walking capacity was assessed by treadmill and quality of life by a questionnaire exploring various aspects of daily life. RESULTS In the target population, that is, patients who at baseline walked less than or equal to 250 m and showed a maximal walking distance variability less than or equal to 25%, per-protocol analysis showed that the effect of propinyl-L-carnitine was significantly greater than that with placebo for both maximal walking distance and initial claudication distance (ICD). In the intention-to-treat population, maximal walking distance increased by 62 +/- 14% on propionyl-L-carnitine and by 46 +/- 9% (p < 0.05) on placebo, while no difference between treatments was observed for ICD. The beneficial effect of propionyl-L-carnitine mas confirmed when data of the target population were pooled with these of patients who at baseline walked less than or equal to 250 m and showed a >25% maximal walking distance <50% variability. Actually, maximal walking distance increased by 98 +/- 16% in the propionyl-L-carnitine group and by only 54 +/- 10% in the placebo group (p < 0.01). The corresponding values for ICD were 99 +/- 21% and 51 +/- 8% (p < 0.05). For patients with baseline maximal walking distance >250 m, no difference between treatments was observed. CONCLUSIONS Claudicants with maximal walking distance less than or equal to 250 m benefited from the use of propionyl-L-carnitine, with improvement in walking distance and quality of life. However, patients with mild functional impairment (i.e., walking distance >250 m) showed no response to propionyl-L-carnitine. (C) 1999 by the American College of Cardiology.


Publication metadata

Author(s): Brevetti G, Diehm C, Lambert D, Study Investigators

Publication type: Article

Publication status: Published

Journal: Journal of the American College of Cardiology

Year: 1999

Volume: 34

Issue: 5

Pages: 1618-1624

Print publication date: 29/10/1999

ISSN (print):

ISSN (electronic): 1558-3597

Publisher: Elsevier Inc.

URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0735-1097(99)00373-3

DOI: 10.1016/S0735-1097(99)00373-3


Altmetrics

Altmetrics provided by Altmetric


Share