Toggle Main Menu Toggle Search

Open Access padlockePrints

The Newcastle University research output collection, currently available on ePrints, will shortly be moving to a new open repository platform, Figshare. To prepare for the data migration we have paused adding new content to ePrints, and will resume once the new repository is launched. During this time you will continue to have access to ePrints (but no new content will appear). We will share updates here when available.

Diagnosis of human metapneumovirus by immunofluorescence staining with monoclonal antibodies in the North-East of England

Lookup NU author(s): Fiona Fenwick, Martin Robinson, Emeritus Professor Geoffrey Toms

Downloads

Full text for this publication is not currently held within this repository. Alternative links are provided below where available.


Abstract

Background: Since its discovery in 2001 human metapneumovirus (hMPV) has been shown to be a significant cause of human respiratory disease, responsible for 5-8% of respiratory infections in hospitalised children. Diagnosis hitherto has been largely carried out by reverse tanscriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) but immunofluorescence staining of cells from nasopharyngeal secretions (IF) offers advantages for some laboratories and may produce a more rapid result in urgent cases. We have recently demonstrated that IF with a rabbit antiserum gave sensitivity equal to that of RT-PCR. However, monoclonal antibodies offer a more plentiful, uniform IF reagent. Objectives: Here we have evaluated a pool of anti-hMPV monoclonal antibodies in the routine diagnosis of respiratory infections in hospitalised infants and children. Study design: Eight hundred and fifty-seven routine respiratory specimens were tested by IF with rabbit polyclonal antiserum and monoclonal antibody pool in parallel. A further 1003 specimens were tested with the monoclonal antibody pool alone. All specimens were also tested for a panel of other respiratory viruses by IF. Results: Both rabbit polyclonal antiserum and monoclonal antibody pool gave positive results in 56 and negative results in 797 specimens. The rabbit polyclonal antibody detected virus in a further two specimens which were negative when tested with the monoclonal pool giving a concordance of 96.6% and a specificity of 100% for the monoclonal antibody pool. Overall hMPV was detected in 5% of specimens whilst 18.4% were positive for hRSV. Conclusions: The monoclonal antibody pool-based IF is a robust assay suitable for routine use with a sensitivity only slightly less than that of the other major diagnostic methodologies available. © 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.


Publication metadata

Author(s): Fenwick F, Young B, McGuckin R, Robinson MJ, Taha Y, Taylor CE, Toms GL

Publication type: Article

Publication status: Published

Journal: Journal of Clinical Virology

Year: 2007

Volume: 40

Issue: 3

Pages: 193-196

ISSN (print): 1386-6532

ISSN (electronic): 1873-5967

Publisher: Elsevier BV

URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcv.2007.07.018

DOI: 10.1016/j.jcv.2007.07.018

PubMed id: 17869169


Altmetrics

Altmetrics provided by Altmetric


Share