Toggle Main Menu Toggle Search

Open Access padlockePrints

The Newcastle University research output collection, currently available on ePrints, will shortly be moving to a new open repository platform, Figshare. To prepare for the data migration we have paused adding new content to ePrints, and will resume once the new repository is launched. During this time you will continue to have access to ePrints (but no new content will appear). We will share updates here when available.

Older working adults in the HEAF study are more likely to report loneliness after two years of follow-up if they have negative perceptions of their work quality

Lookup NU author(s): Dr Holly Syddall

Downloads


Licence

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).


Abstract

© 2021, The Author(s). Background: Loneliness is an important public health issue associated with mortality and morbidity. Often researched amongst older people, less is known about risk factors for loneliness among adults aged 50–64 years who are in work. We investigated (a) if exit from the workforce increases the odds of loneliness; (b) whether adverse psychosocial work factors are associated with increased odds of loneliness over 2 years of follow-up; and (c) whether the association is stronger among subjects still working compared with those who have exited the workforce. Methods: Data came from the Health and Employment After Fifty (HEAF) study, a large population cohort who provided questionnaire information about work and health at baseline and 2 annual follow-ups. Logistic regression was used to explore the association between psychosocial risk factors and loneliness at follow-up 2, with adjustment for loneliness at baseline, sex, age, self-rated health, living alone, and mental health diagnosis. Results: Of the initial 8134 participants, 4521 were working at baseline and provided data for this analysis. Of those, 507 (11.2%) were defined as lonely at 2 years’ follow-up. Exiting the workforce was not significantly associated with loneliness (OR = 1.1, 95%CI: 0.7–1.7). However, negative psychosocial work factors predicted loneliness at follow-up. After mutual adjustment, lack of choice at work (OR: 1.5, 95%CI: 1.1–1.9), often lying awake worrying about work (OR: 1.4, 95%CI: 1.0–1.9) and perceived not coping with physical demands of the job (OR: 1.3, 95%CI: 1.0–1.7) were independent predictors, with associations robust to adjustment for demographic factors and health. Associations were only slightly altered when we restricted the sample to those who remained in work until the end of follow-up. Conclusions: Loneliness amongst middle-aged working adults is not predicted by permanent work exit but is predicted by individuals’ perceptions about their work. Provision of good-quality work, matched to the capacity of the older worker, could prevent loneliness.


Publication metadata

Author(s): Bevilacqua G, D'Angelo S, Ntani G, Syddall HE, Harris EC, Linaker C, Stevens M, Cooper C, Walker-Bone K

Publication type: Article

Publication status: Published

Journal: BMC Public Health

Year: 2021

Volume: 21

Online publication date: 23/03/2021

Acceptance date: 09/03/2021

Date deposited: 11/09/2026

ISSN (electronic): 1471-2458

Publisher: BioMed Central Ltd

URL: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-10610-5

DOI: 10.1186/s12889-021-10610-5

Data Access Statement: The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available on reasonable request from the “MRC Versus Arthritis Centre for Musculoskeletal Health and Work” by contacting. Dr. Holly Syddall: hes@mrc.soton.ac.uk or Dr. Catherine Linaker: chl@mrc.soton.ac.uk The HEAF study is part of the Cohort and Longitudinal Studies Enhancement Resources (CLOSER), the home of longitudinal research, bringing together longitudinal studies: https://www.closer.ac.uk/. Data and questionnaires from HEAF can be searched and browsed using the CLOSER Discovery search engine: https://discovery.closer.ac.uk/.

PubMed id: 33757464


Altmetrics

Altmetrics provided by Altmetric


Funding

Funder referenceFunder name
Economic and Social Research Council and Medical Research Council jointly Lifelong Health & Wellbeing grants (ES/L002663/1)
Medical Research Council programme grant (MC_UU_12011/5)
MRC Versus Arthritis Centre for Musculoskeletal Health and Work

Share