Toggle Main Menu Toggle Search

Open Access padlockePrints

Long-term clinical and cost-effectiveness of a fully automated digital cognitive behavioural therapy for insomnia: 2-year follow-up of a single-blind, superiority, randomised controlled trial

Lookup NU author(s): Emeritus Professor Jan Scott

Downloads


Licence

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).


Abstract

© 2026 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Background: We evaluated the long-term clinical and cost-effectiveness of fully automated digital cognitive behavioural therapy for insomnia (dCBT-I) or online patient education (PE) in the Norwegian general population. Methods: A parallel-group, participant-blinded, superiority randomised controlled trial in self-referred adults with significant insomnia symptoms (Insomnia Severity Index [ISI] ≥12). Participants completed automated screening prior to randomisation and outcomes were assessed over 2 years. The primary outcome (9-week clinical effectiveness) has been published. We now report intention-to-treat analyses from the 6-month and 2-year follow-ups. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), with non-parametric bootstrapping, summarized the between-group societal costs in 2019 Euros, and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). The trial was preregistered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02558647) and followed a prespecified protocol. Findings: 1720 participants (1167 [67.8%] female; mean age 44.4) were randomised between February 26, 2016, and July 1, 2018 (867 to dCBT-I vs. 853 to PE). The final follow-up included 587/1720 (34.1%) participants (dCBT-I = 315; PE = 272), a median of 28.3 months (IQR 22.6 to 34.0) after baseline. At 2-year follow-up the mean ISI was 10.7 (SD 5.9) in the dCBT-I group and 13.4 (5.9) in the PE group (estimated difference: −1.77 [95% CI: −2.65 to −0.90]; Cohen’s d= −0.43). The dCBT-I group reported −€278 [95% CI: −1413 to 858] lower costs and 0.025 QALYs gained [95% CI: 0.010 to 0.041] compared with PE, yielding a 94% probability of cost-effectiveness at €0 willingness-to-pay (ICER: −€10,973 per QALY gained). No harms or adverse events were reported. Interpretation: Compared with online PE, fully automated, low-threshold dCBT-I demonstrates greater short-term (9 week) and longer-term improvements (≥2 years) in insomnia severity and is likely cost-effective over the 2-year horizon. However, effects attenuated over time and long-term certainty is limited by attrition. Funding: Norwegian Council of Research; Liaison Committee for Education, Research and Innovation in Central Norway.


Publication metadata

Author(s): Vethe D, Khan ZA, Vestergaard CL, Halsteinli V, Saksvik SB, Vedaa O, Sivertsen B, Morken G, Langsrud K, Ritterband LM, Robert F Smith O, Scott J, Kallestad H

Publication type: Article

Publication status: Published

Journal: The Lancet Regional Health - Europe

Year: 2026

Volume: 66

Online publication date: 08/05/2026

Acceptance date: 15/04/2026

Date deposited: 19/05/2026

ISSN (electronic): 2666-7762

Publisher: Elsevier Ltd

URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lanepe.2026.101691

DOI: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2026.101691

Data Access Statement: Norwegian regulation does not allow for the sharing of these data after completion of the study. Statistical code is available upon reasonable request from the corresponding author.


Altmetrics

Altmetrics provided by Altmetric


Funding

Funder referenceFunder name
Center for Research-Based Innovation on Mobile Mental Health
Research and Innovation in Central Norway (grant number: 90061500)
Research Council of Norway (grant numbers: 239985)

Share