Browse by author
Lookup NU author(s): Dr Louise TannerORCiD, Dr Ryan KennyORCiD, Alex InskipORCiD, Rhiannon PotterORCiD, Fiona Pearson
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0).
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2026. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ Group. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.Objectives: To identify and synthesise evidence pertaining to ‘health check’ programmes for the assessment of cardiovascular risk factors and disease delivered to adult populations in countries with universal healthcare. Design: A systematic umbrella review was undertaken. The protocol for this systematic umbrella review was registered on the PROSPERO registry and was undertaken based on Cochrane guidance and reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guideline. Data sources: Medline, Embase, Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Scopus, Google Scholar and Health Management Information Consortium (HMIC) were searched. These searches identified records published between January 2009 and February 2025. Eligibility criteria: The inclusion criteria for the review were as follows: population—adults aged ≥18 years; intervention—health checks including the assessment of cardiovascular risk factors and disease; comparators—non-recipients, variations of health checks and within-person pre/post assessments; outcomes—uptake and diagnosis rates, cardiovascular disease (CVD) and related clinical and behavioural risk factors, referral changes, and barriers and facilitators to uptake. Studies published prior to 2009 (when NHS Health Checks were introduced) and those from countries without universal healthcare provision were excluded. Screening was performed independently by two reviewers and conflicts were resolved via discussion or adjudication by a third reviewer. Data extraction and synthesis: Data extraction and quality appraisal were performed independently by a single reviewer and checked by a second reviewer. The quality of included reviews was assessed using the Risk of Bias in Systematic Reviews (ROBIS) (for quantitative evidence) and the Swedish Agency for Medical and Social Evaluation tool (for qualitative evidence). The results of this systematic umbrella review were synthesised narratively. Results: Results from meta-analyses reported by the included systematic reviews showed that the effects of health checks on cardiovascular and total mortality, stroke and coronary heart disease were mixed and generally non-significant. Conversely, health checks generally showed significant, positive effects (reductions) in CVD risk factors including blood pressure, body mass index and cholesterol levels. Non-significant reductions in smoking were found in two meta-analyses. Health checks were generally cost-effective; however, it was found that the cost-effectiveness of health checks could be improved through targeting towards ‘high risk’ populations defined based on socioeconomic factors, obesity and family history of CVD. Health check attendance versus non-attendance was related to demographic, attitudinal, socioeconomic and practical factors. The effectiveness of health checks was influenced by factors including social support to make changes to health behaviours and the availability and accessibility of referral options. Conclusions: Overall, health checks had a positive impact on the detection of and improvement in the levels of cardiovascular risk factors. There was limited evidence of impact on the occurrence of longer term CVD events, which could reflect the limitations of onward treatment for CVD. Cardiovascular health checks could be more effective and cost-effective if targeted towards high-risk groups. The ability to access appointments at convenient times and venues and increased opportunities for social support may increase health check uptake, and increased availability and accessibility of referral options may improve their effectiveness. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42024487529.
Author(s): Tanner L, Kenny RPW, Inskip A, Potter R, Lewis R, Gregory N, Jesurasa A, Pearson F
Publication type: Article
Publication status: Published
Journal: BMJ Open
Year: 2026
Volume: 16
Issue: 5
Online publication date: 06/05/2026
Acceptance date: 30/03/2026
Date deposited: 18/05/2026
ISSN (electronic): 2044-6055
Publisher: BMJ Publishing Group
URL: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-112719
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-112719
Data Access Statement: All data relevant to the study are included in the article or uploaded as supplementary information.
PubMed id: 42091142
Altmetrics provided by Altmetric
