Toggle Main Menu Toggle Search

Open Access padlockePrints

Metallicity Gradients in Modern Cosmological Simulations. II. The Role of Bursty versus Smooth Feedback at High Redshift

Lookup NU author(s): Dr Tiago CostaORCiD

Downloads


Licence

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).


Abstract

© 2026. The Author(s). Published by the American Astronomical Society. Original content from this work may be used under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 licence. Any further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the title of the work, journal citation and DOI. The distribution of gas-phase metals within galaxies encodes the impact of stellar feedback on galactic evolution. At high redshift, when galaxies are rapidly assembling, feedback-driven outflows and turbulence can strongly reshape radial metallicity gradients. In this work, we use the FIRE-2, SPICE, Thesan Box, and Thesan Zoom cosmological simulations—spanning a range of stellar feedback, from bursty (time-variable) to smooth (steady)—to investigate how these feedback modes shape gas-phase metallicity gradients at 3 < z ≲ 11. Across all models, we find that galaxies with bursty feedback (FIRE-2, SPICE Bursty, and Thesan Zoom) develop systematically flatter (by factors of ∼2–10) metallicity gradients than those with smooth feedback (SPICE Smooth and Thesan Box), particularly at stellar masses M⋆ > 109 M⊙. These results demonstrate that bursty stellar feedback provides sufficient turbulence to prevent strong negative gradients from forming, while smooth stellar feedback does not generically allow for the efficient radial redistribution of metals, thereby keeping gradients steep. Finally, we compare with recent observations, finding that the majority—but, notably, not all—of the observed gradients may favor a bursty stellar feedback scenario. In all, these results highlight the utility of high-resolution observations of gas-phase metallicity at high redshift as a key discriminator of these qualitatively different feedback types.


Publication metadata

Author(s): Garcia AM, Torrey P, Bhagwat A, Shen X, Vogelsberger M, McClymont W, Nagarajan-Swenson J, Ridolfo SG, Zhu P, Zimmerman DT, Zier O, Biddle S, Sarkar A, Chakraborty P, Wright RJ, Grasha K, Costa T, Keating L, Kannan R, Smith A, Garaldi E, Puchwein E, Ciardi B, Hernquist L, Kewley LJ

Publication type: Article

Publication status: Published

Journal: Astrophysical Journal

Year: 2026

Volume: 1001

Issue: 2

Print publication date: 20/04/2026

Online publication date: 16/04/2026

Acceptance date: 19/03/2026

Date deposited: 12/05/2026

ISSN (print): 0004-637X

ISSN (electronic): 1538-4357

Publisher: American Astronomical Society

URL: https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ae561e

DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/ae561e


Altmetrics

Altmetrics provided by Altmetric


Funding

Funder referenceFunder name
NASA theory grant JWST-AR-04814
National Science Foundation under Cooperative Agreement 2421782
Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) through a Discovery Grant and a Discovery Launch Supplement (funding reference Nos. RGPIN-2024-06222 and DGECR-2024-00144)
NSF-AST 2346977
NSF-Simons AI Institute for Cosmic Origins
Royal Society Research grant G125142
Science and Technology Facilities Council (STFC) Center for Doctoral Training (CDT) in Data Intensive Science at the University of Cambridge (STFC grant No. 2742968)
Royal Society University Research Fellowship (grant No. URF\R1\251793)
Simons Foundation award MPS-AI-00010515
Virginia Space Grant Consortium Graduate STEM Research Fellowship
York University Global Research Excellence Initiative

Share