Toggle Main Menu Toggle Search

Open Access padlockePrints

The Newcastle University research output collection, currently available on ePrints, will shortly be moving to a new open repository platform, Figshare. To prepare for the data migration we have paused adding new content to ePrints, and will resume once the new repository is launched. During this time you will continue to have access to ePrints (but no new content will appear). We will share updates here when available.

Patients With Increased Anxiety and Depression Scores Are at Greater Risk of Not Achieving a Meaningful Improvement in Patient-Reported Outcomes After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome

Lookup NU author(s): Ajay MalviyaORCiD

Downloads

Full text for this publication is not currently held within this repository. Alternative links are provided below where available.


Abstract

© 2026 the Arthroscopy Association of North America. PURPOSE: To evaluate whether patients undergoing arthroscopic intervention for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome with preoperative anxiety or depression potentially experience reduced benefit from arthroscopic surgery. METHODS: All patient pathways (hips) over 18 years entered into the UK Non-Arthroplasty Hip Registry between 2012 and 2024 who underwent arthroscopic intervention for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome were included. Exclusions were revision procedures, planned 1st/2nd of a two-stage procedure. Patient demographics, EuroQol 5-Dimension 5-Level, and International Hip Outcome Tool-12 (iHOT-12) scores preoperatively and 1-year were recorded. EuroQol 5-Dimension 5-Level question 5 was used as a surrogate for anxiety/depression. The iHOT-12 score was used to quantify outcomes of hip function. RESULTS: We identified 5109 hips that underwent hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome; 56% were female, with an average age of 35.3 (SD: 10.1) years. Mean preoperative iHOT-12 score was 33 (SD: 18) and at 1-year 59 (SD: 28) with a mean improvement of 26 (range: -61 to 93). There was a significant negative correlation between preoperative anxiety/depression and iHOT-12 at both baseline and 1 year (r = -0.309, P < .001). There was no significant correlation between change in iHOT-12 (ΔiHOT-12) (r = 0.0282, P = .206). Among female patients, 66% improved by minimally clinically important difference, whereas only 61% of males did (P = .049). Patients achieving minimally clinically important difference was significantly lower (47% vs 63%, P = .031) in the group with the highest preop anxiety scores. At 1 year, 33% of patients reported improvement, 49% showed no change, and 18% experienced worsening in their anxiety/depression scores. Patients with higher preoperative scores showed the greatest improvement. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed a negative correlation between increased anxiety/depression and iHOT-12 outcomes; however, this was not reflected in the relative improvement in outcomes. Those with greatest preoperative anxiety/depression were at greater risk of not achieving minimally clinically important difference yet were most likely to see an improvement in their anxiety/depression scores. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective comparative case series.


Publication metadata

Author(s): van Duren BH, Pursun Y, Andrade AJ, Bankes MJK, Khanduja V, Malviya A

Publication type: Article

Publication status: Published

Journal: Arthroscopy

Year: 2026

Volume: 42

Issue: 2

Pages: 455-464

Online publication date: 24/03/2026

Acceptance date: 18/07/2025

ISSN (print): 0749-8063

ISSN (electronic): 1526-3231

Publisher: John Wiley and Sons Inc.

URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/arj.70014

DOI: 10.1002/arj.70014

PubMed id: 41877428


Altmetrics

Altmetrics provided by Altmetric


Share