Toggle Main Menu Toggle Search

Open Access padlockePrints

The Newcastle University research output collection, currently available on ePrints, will shortly be moving to a new open repository platform, Figshare. To prepare for the data migration we have paused adding new content to ePrints, and will resume once the new repository is launched. During this time you will continue to have access to ePrints (but no new content will appear). We will share updates here when available.

Differences in thyroid hormone prescribing practices between Japan Thyroid Association-certified thyroid specialists and non-certified members: a nationwide survey in Japan

Lookup NU author(s): Dr Petros PerrosORCiD

Downloads


Licence

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND).


Abstract

© The Japan Endocrine Society.Thyroid hormone (TH) prescribing practices, particularly on hypothyroid and euthyroid patients, were compared between Japan Thyroid Association (JTA)-certified thyroid specialists and non-certified members. A nationwide questionnaire survey (Treatment of Hypothyroidism in Europe by Specialists: An International Survey) was conducted among all 2,938 JTA members, including 874 certified specialists and 2,064 non-certified members, to assess self-reported TH prescription choices in various clinical scenarios. Responses from certified specialists and non-certified members were statistically compared. A total of 207 certified specialists (23.7%) and 129 non-certified members (6.3%) responded and completed the questionnaire. Although all certified specialists and non-certified members selected levothyroxine (LT4) as first-line therapy for hypothyroidism, certified specialists more often used liothyronine (LT3) plus LT4 combination therapy than non-certified members (28% vs. 12%, p < 0.001), particularly for LT4-treated patients with persistent hypothyroid-like symptoms (9% vs. 2%, p = 0.02). For euthyroid individuals, 71% of certified specialists and 60% of non-certified members considered TH treatment (p = 0.043). Non-certified members who see >100 hypothyroid patients per year were more inclined to use combination therapy for hypothyroid patients and TH for euthyroid patients than those of ≤100 patients (p < 0.049 and 0.001, respectively). In conclusion, JTA-certified thyroid specialists and non-certified members exhibit distinct TH prescribing patterns. Certified specialists are more open to combination therapy and treating selected euthyroid patients, whereas non-certified members favor guideline-based LT4 monotherapy. These differences underscore the impact of specialization on clinical practice and suggest a need for updated guidelines and targeted education to rationalize thyroid care.


Publication metadata

Author(s): Nagayama Y, Tajiri J, Murakami T, Watanabe N, Sato S, Shindo H, Tachibana S, Attanasio R, Papini E, Perros P, Nagy EV, Hegedus L, Ito K, Yamashita H

Publication type: Article

Publication status: Published

Journal: Endocrine Journal

Year: 2026

Volume: 73

Issue: 3

Pages: 429-438

Print publication date: 02/03/2026

Online publication date: 11/11/2025

Acceptance date: 08/10/2025

Date deposited: 16/03/2026

ISSN (print): 0918-8959

ISSN (electronic): 1348-4540

Publisher: Japan Endocrine Society

URL: https://doi.org/10.1507/endocrj.EJ25-0466

DOI: 10.1507/endocrj.EJ25-0466

PubMed id: 41224354


Altmetrics

Altmetrics provided by Altmetric


Share