Toggle Main Menu Toggle Search

Open Access padlockePrints

The Newcastle University research output collection, currently available on ePrints, will shortly be moving to a new open repository platform, Figshare. To prepare for the data migration we have paused adding new content to ePrints, and will resume once the new repository is launched. During this time you will continue to have access to ePrints (but no new content will appear). We will share updates here when available.

What drives agroforestry in Great Britain? Analysing economic, structural, social, and policy factors

Lookup NU author(s): Dr Francisco ArealORCiD, Dr Kyriaki Remoundou, Charlie Clark, RAO Fu, Professor Lynn FrewerORCiD

Downloads


Licence

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).


Abstract

Agroforestry (AF) is a critical solution for climate, biodiversity, and food security, yet its adoption is hindered by a lack of practice-specific evidence. This paper examines the factors influencing farmer adoption of eight AF practices in Great Britain. Survey data from 315 farmers, including a Best-Worst Scaling experiment, is analysed using a spatial multivariate ordered probit model. The analysis shows that farmer adoption intention is strongest for low-intensity practices (e.g., small woods, windbreaks) and weakest for integrated systems like silvoarable, silvopasture and agrosilvopasture with economic, structural, social, and policy factors exerting practice-specific influences. This evidence, alongside key farmer preferences for financial incentives and simplified regulations but against mandatory public access, points to stronger five-year adoption potential low-intensity AF options compared to more transformative, integrated practices. Consequently, effective strategies to increase AF adoption must be practice-specific, designed to address the distinct technical and perceptual barriers for each AF system. Effective policy should align incentives and communication with farmers characteristics. We show that a one-size-fits-all approach is inadequate; scaling up AF requires a dual strategy of practice-specific interventions, such as targeted financial support, and building market infrastructure for silvoarable, coupled with demographically-tailored outreach that aligns scheme communication with farmer identity, age, and location. We conclude that scaling up AF requires differentiated, evidence-based interventions tailored to both the specific AF practice and the farmer.


Publication metadata

Author(s): Areal FJ, Remoundou K, Clark C, Jin S, Fu R, Eigenbrod F, Lukac M, The YA, Frewer LJ

Publication type: Article

Publication status: Published

Journal: Land Use Policy

Year: 2026

Volume: 165

Print publication date: 01/06/2026

Online publication date: 28/02/2026

Acceptance date: 26/02/2026

Date deposited: 27/02/2026

ISSN (print): 0264-8377

ISSN (electronic): 1873-5754

Publisher: Elsevier Ltd

URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2026.108008

DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2026.108008

Data Access Statement: Data will be made available on request.


Altmetrics

Altmetrics provided by Altmetric


Funding

Funder referenceFunder name
DEFRA, Contract for Nature for Climate Fund Agroforestry Social Research - C20995
UKRI (Future of UK Treescapes programme, grant number NE/X003833/1)

Share