Toggle Main Menu Toggle Search

Open Access padlockePrints

The Newcastle University research output collection, currently available on ePrints, will shortly be moving to a new open repository platform, Figshare. To prepare for the data migration we have paused adding new content to ePrints, and will resume once the new repository is launched. During this time you will continue to have access to ePrints (but no new content will appear). We will share updates here when available.

High early complication risk but low risk of re-revision beyond 5 years following revision knee arthroplasty in the elderly: An analysis of 2833 cases using real-world data from an international database

Lookup NU author(s): Professor David Deehan

Downloads

Full text for this publication is not currently held within this repository. Alternative links are provided below where available.


Abstract

© 2025 European Society of Sports Traumatology, Knee Surgery and Arthroscopy.Purpose: With an increasing global elderly population, the number of revision total knee arthroplasties (rTKAs) in patients aged ≥80 years is rising. However, outcomes in this age group remain difficult to report and poorly understood. This study aimed to evaluate clinical outcomes, 90-day complication rates and long-term implant survivorship after rTKA in patients aged ≥80 years, and to compare results between revisions for aseptic loosening and prosthetic joint infection (PJI). Methods: Data were extracted from TriNetX, a global healthcare database covering 21 countries. Patients aged ≥80 years undergoing rTKA were included. Outcomes assessed included 90-day complications and mortality, crude re-revision rates at 2, 5 and 10 years, and implant and patient survivorship. Propensity score-matched analysis compared outcomes between aseptic loosening and PJI cohorts. Cox regression identified predictors of 90-day mortality and 2-year re-revision risk. Results: A total of 2833 patients were included. Ninety-day mortality was 2.7%. Acute kidney injury (AKI) was the most frequent complication (9.9%), particularly among PJI patients (18.2%). Crude re-revision rates were 9.3%, 10.4% and 10.5% at 2, 5 and 10 years, respectively, while implant survivorship was 87.7%, 83.6% and 81.8%. Ten-year patient survivorship was 38.8%. Patients with PJI had higher comorbidity burdens and postoperative complication rates. After matching, PJI patients showed increased risk of 90-day mortality (relative risk [RR] = 2.00, p = 0.051) and AKI (RR = 1.91, p < 0.001). Cox regression confirmed PJI as an independent predictor of 90-day mortality (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.51, p = 0.008) and 2-year re-revision (HR = 1.70, p = 0.001). Conclusions: Elderly patients undergoing rTKA for PJI exhibit greater comorbidity, higher complication rates and increased early mortality compared to those revised for aseptic loosening. Re-revision beyond 5 years is uncommon. In this population, outcomes such as mortality, mobility and quality of life may be more clinically meaningful than long-term implant survivorship. Level of Evidence: Level IV.


Publication metadata

Author(s): Tyas B, Williams J, Jameson S, Deehan D, Baker P

Publication type: Article

Publication status: Published

Journal: Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy

Year: 2026

Volume: 34

Issue: 8

Pages: 2887-2896

Print publication date: 01/08/2026

Online publication date: 14/11/2025

Acceptance date: 25/10/2025

ISSN (print): 0942-2056

ISSN (electronic): 1433-7347

Publisher: John Wiley and Sons Inc

URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/ksa.70190

DOI: 10.1002/ksa.70190


Altmetrics

Altmetrics provided by Altmetric


Share