Toggle Main Menu Toggle Search

Open Access padlockePrints

The Newcastle University research output collection, currently available on ePrints, will shortly be moving to a new open repository platform, Figshare. To prepare for the data migration we have paused adding new content to ePrints, and will resume once the new repository is launched. During this time you will continue to have access to ePrints (but no new content will appear). We will share updates here when available.

Prescription Patterns in Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty (DMEK): A European Survey

Lookup NU author(s): Professor Francisco FigueiredoORCiD

Downloads


Licence

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).


Abstract

© 2025 The Author(s).Purpose:To assess current prescription patterns in Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty (DMEK) in Europe.Setting:Countries affiliated with the European Cornea and Cell Transplantation Registry (ECCTR) and the European Vision Institute Clinical Research Network (EVICR.net).Design:Cross-sectional study (European survey).Methods:An electronic survey was distributed to 16 national societies to gather data on prescription patterns for DMEK. Responses were categorized by three clinical goals: prevention of postoperative endophthalmitis, graft rejection, and pupillary block and glaucoma.Results:Responses from 136 surgeons revealed that medication protocols mainly came from departmental protocols (54%) or personal experiences (48%) rather than national guidelines (22%) (multiple answers were allowed). Infection prevention primarily relied on intraoperative (72%) and postoperative (92%) antibiotics, with preoperative use less common (18%). Steroids were the mainstay for rejection prevention, used intraoperatively (59%), postoperatively (100%), and occasionally preoperatively (13%). Steroids were typically tapered to once daily after six months (46%) and discontinued after varying durations (65%). Dexamethasone was the preferred steroid. For high-risk DMEK, the most common approach was adding another topical (30%) or systemic immunosuppressive drug (24%), such as cyclosporine or mycophenolate. For graft rejection, most respondents increased topical steroid frequency (85%) or added (peri)bulbar steroid injections (42%). Pupillary block and glaucoma prophylaxis mainly involved intraoperative mydriatics (34%); intraocular pressure-lowering agents were rarely used (0.7-2.2%). For steroid-induced ocular hypertension, the common approach was switching to a lower-potency steroid (40%) or reducing steroid frequency (43%).Conclusions:Current prescription patterns in routine and high-risk DMEK vary significantly, reflecting the lack of standardized guidelines.


Publication metadata

Author(s): Ye Y, De Rooij F, Alejandre N, Van Den Biggelaar FJHM, Bourcier T, Cochener-Lamard B, Figueiredo FC, Galarreta DJ, Hjortdal J, Jones GLA, Nathan N, Nuijts RMMA, Romano V, Rosa AM, Seitz B, Tassignon M-J, Wacker K, Dickman MM

Publication type: Article

Publication status: Published

Journal: Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery

Year: 2025

Volume: 51

Issue: 11

Pages: 941-947

Print publication date: 01/11/2025

Online publication date: 20/06/2025

Acceptance date: 02/04/2018

Date deposited: 04/11/2025

ISSN (print): 0886-3350

ISSN (electronic): 1873-4502

Publisher: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins

URL: https://doi.org/10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001726

DOI: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001726


Altmetrics

Altmetrics provided by Altmetric


Share