Toggle Main Menu Toggle Search

Open Access padlockePrints

The Newcastle University research output collection, currently available on ePrints, will shortly be moving to a new open repository platform, Figshare. To prepare for the data migration we have paused adding new content to ePrints, and will resume once the new repository is launched. During this time you will continue to have access to ePrints (but no new content will appear). We will share updates here when available.

Antifungal use in immunocompromised children in Europe: a 12-week multicenter weekly point prevalence survey (CALYPSO)

Lookup NU author(s): Professor Marieke Emonts-le ClercqORCiD, Dr Liz Ghimenton

Downloads


Licence

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).


Abstract

We prospectively analyzed antifungal use in immunocompromised children through a multicenter 12-week weekly point-prevalence survey in 31 hematology-oncology (HO) and hematopoietic stem cell/solid organ transplant (HSCT/SOT) units of 18 hospitals in 11 European countries. All patients hospitalized and receiving systemic antifungals were included. Ward policies, and weekly ward/patient data were collected. All 21 HO and 10 HSCT/SOT units had prophylaxis policies for high-risk patients (27/31 used azoles, 14/31 echinocandins and 15/31 liposomal amphotericin B [LAMB]). Among 572 courses recorded, prophylaxis was indicated in 439/572 (77%) and treatment in 133/572 (62/133 empirical, 43/133 pre-emptive, 28/133 targeted). Among patients receiving prophylaxis, 56% belonged to the non-high-risk group. Most common reasons for empirical, pre-emptive and targeted treatment were antibiotic-resistant febrile neutropenia (52%), abnormalities on chest-CT with/without positive galactomannan (77%) and candidiasis (82%), respectively. Fluconazole and LAMB were the most frequently prescribed agents both for prophylaxis (31%, 21%) and treatment (32%, 23%). Underdosing of micafungin for treatment in 50% of prescriptions and of fluconazole for treatment and prophylaxis in 70% of cases was noticed. In conclusion, most antifungal prescribing was for prophylaxis, with fluconazole being the main antifungal prescribed. Inadequate doses of antifungal prescribing and prophylaxis of non-high-risk patients could be targets for improvement.


Publication metadata

Author(s): Chorafa E, Iosifidis E, Oletto A, Warris A, Castagnola E, Bruggemann R, Groll AH, Lehrnbecher T, Ferreras Antolin L, Mesini A, Abdalla Alkhaaldi A, Baquero-Artigao F, Sirvan Cetin B, Ebrahimi-Fakhari D, Emonts M, Esposito S, Fainardi V, Ghimenton-Walters E, Gijón M, González Guerrero A, Grasa CD, Kairiene I, Kildonaviciute K, MariaKourti M, Manzanares A, Mendoza-Palomar N, Noni M, Papakonstantinou E, Paulus S, Perwein T, Rascon J, Rincón-López E, Soler-Palacin P, Solopova G, Spoulou V, Strenger V, Tedford K, Tzika C, Zsigmond B, Roilides E

Publication type: Article

Publication status: Published

Journal: Journal of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology

Year: 2025

Volume: 47

Issue: 6

Pages: e222-e230

Print publication date: 01/08/2025

Online publication date: 20/06/2025

Acceptance date: 02/06/2025

Date deposited: 09/06/2025

ISSN (print): 1077-4114

ISSN (electronic): 1536-3678

Publisher: Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.

URL: https://doi.org/10.1097/MPH.0000000000003070

DOI: 10.1097/MPH.0000000000003070

ePrints DOI: 10.57711/2stw-fh81


Altmetrics

Altmetrics provided by Altmetric


Funding

Funder referenceFunder name
European Confederation of Medical Mycology (ECMM)

Share