Toggle Main Menu Toggle Search

Open Access padlockePrints

The Newcastle University research output collection, currently available on ePrints, will shortly be moving to a new open repository platform, Figshare. To prepare for the data migration we have paused adding new content to ePrints, and will resume once the new repository is launched. During this time you will continue to have access to ePrints (but no new content will appear). We will share updates here when available.

Effectiveness of the Let’s Move It multi-level vocational school-based intervention on physical activity and sedentary behavior: a cluster randomized trial

Lookup NU author(s): Professor Falko Sniehotta

Downloads


Licence

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).


Abstract

© The Author(s) 2025. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society of Behavioral Medicine.Background: Low levels of physical activity (PA), more prevalent among those with low education, require effective interventions. Fewer trials have tested interventions to decrease sedentary behavior (SB). No school-based interventions have shown lasting effects on PA or SB in vocational schools. Purpose: To examine whether the Let’s Move It intervention has effects on behavioral and clinical outcomes among vocational students after 2 and 14 months. Methods: A cluster randomized trial in 6 school units in vocational education in Finland (N = 1112) (mean age 18.5 years, range 15–46). The multi-component intervention targeted in-class activity opportunities (eg, teacher-led activity breaks, equipment in classrooms), and students’ motivation and self-regulation (eg, 6 group sessions, à 45–60 min, during the intensive intervention period of 2 months). Valid (≥ 4 days, ≥ 10 h/ day) accelerometer data were obtained from 741 students at baseline, 521 (70.3%) at 2 months, and 406 (54.8%) at 14 months. Results: No evidence of a significant intervention effect on the co-primary outcomes (moderate-to-vigorous PA, SB, breaks in SB) was found. Participants in the intervention arm reduced their total daily SB time by 32 min (95% CI, −43.2 to −20.8) on weekdays, compared with the control arm’s reduction of 8.6 (95% CI, −19.5 to 2.3) and engaged in more accelerometer-measured light PA during school time. Few differences were found in secondary outcomes. The fidelity of intervention delivery was relatively good. Conclusions: This school-based intervention did not affect leisure-time activity. Despite a positive outcome on school-time light PA, more comprehensive or intensive environmental changes may be needed to meaningfully improve vocational students’ total activity


Publication metadata

Author(s): Hankonen N, Haukkala A, Palsola M, Heino MTJ, Sund R, Tokola K, Absetz P, Araujo-Soares V, Sniehotta FF, Borodulin K, Uutela A, Lintunen T, Vasankari T

Publication type: Article

Publication status: Published

Journal: Annals of Behavioral Medicine

Year: 2025

Volume: 59

Issue: 1

Online publication date: 27/05/2025

Acceptance date: 02/04/2018

Date deposited: 14/01/2026

ISSN (print): 0883-6612

ISSN (electronic): 1532-4796

Publisher: Oxford University Press

URL: https://doi.org/10.1093/abm/kaaf023

DOI: 10.1093/abm/kaaf023

Data Access Statement: De-identified data from this study are available in a protected archive, Finnish Social Science Data Archive (https://www. fsd.tuni.fi/en/). Data can be obtained for research purposes by contacting the customer service at user-services.fsd@tuni.fi.

PubMed id: 40423552


Altmetrics

Altmetrics provided by Altmetric


Funding

Funder referenceFunder name
Ministry of Education and Culture (34/626/2012, 81/626/2014)

Share