Toggle Main Menu Toggle Search

Open Access padlockePrints

The Newcastle University research output collection, currently available on ePrints, will shortly be moving to a new open repository platform, Figshare. To prepare for the data migration we have paused adding new content to ePrints, and will resume once the new repository is launched. During this time you will continue to have access to ePrints (but no new content will appear). We will share updates here when available.

Efficacy and safety of iGlarLixi versus IDegAsp in people with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with basal insulin: A systematic literature review and network meta-analysis of non-Asian studies

Lookup NU author(s): Emeritus Professor Philip Home

Downloads


Licence

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).


Abstract

© 2025 The Author(s). Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.Aims: To estimate the relative treatment effect of iGlarLixi (a fixed-ratio combination of insulin glargine 100 U/mL plus lixisenatide) versus premixed insulin IDegAsp (insulin degludec plus insulin aspart) in people with type 2 diabetes (T2D) who advanced from basal insulin to iGlarLixi or IDegAsp in non-Asian studies. Materials and Methods: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were identified in a systematic review by searching Embase (including congress abstracts from 2021 to 2023), MEDLINE® and CENTRAL on 10 October 2023. Treatment outcomes from non-Asian RCTs for people with T2D previously treated with basal insulin, who switched to iGlarLixi or IDegAsp, were compared using a network meta-analysis (NMA). Data analysis was performed using R, version 4.0.2. Results: The NMA included four RCTs (N = 2535). The results of the NMA showed that iGlarLixi (n = 810) was associated with a significantly greater reduction in HbA1c versus IDegAsp (n = 454) (mean difference [MD]: −0.39 [95% credible interval, CrI: −0.58, −0.21] %-units). iGlarLixi was also associated with a significantly greater likelihood of achieving an HbA1c of <7.0% (risk ratio: 1.42, 95% CrI: 1.18, 1.71). A greater reduction in postprandial glucose was observed with iGlarLixi versus IDegAsp (MD: −1.38 [95% CrI: −2.15, −0.63] mmol/L). A body weight benefit that favoured iGlarLixi versus IDegAsp was documented (MD: −1.54 [95% CrI: −2.26, −0.84] kg). Hypoglycaemia evaluation was inconclusive due to definitional differences between trials. Conclusions: Once-daily iGlarLixi was associated with superior blood glucose control and body weight benefit compared with IDegAsp in insulin-experienced populations with T2D in non-Asian RCTs.


Publication metadata

Author(s): Home P, Lauand F, Djaballah K, Li X-T, Hafidh K, Mehta R, Faraoun K, Anaforoglu I, Serafini P, Pourrahmat M-M

Publication type: Article

Publication status: Published

Journal: Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism

Year: 2025

Volume: 27

Issue: 6

Pages: 3410-3418

Print publication date: 01/06/2025

Online publication date: 02/04/2025

Acceptance date: 12/03/2025

Date deposited: 23/04/2025

ISSN (print): 1462-8902

ISSN (electronic): 1463-1326

Publisher: John Wiley and Sons Inc

URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/dom.16360

DOI: 10.1111/dom.16360

Data Access Statement: Data are available through the corresponding author upon reasonable request. Further details on Sanofi's data-sharing criteria, eligible studies and process for requesting access can be found at https://www.vivli.org.


Altmetrics

Altmetrics provided by Altmetric


Funding

Funder referenceFunder name
Sanofi

Share