Toggle Main Menu Toggle Search

Open Access padlockePrints

The Newcastle University research output collection, currently available on ePrints, will shortly be moving to a new open repository platform, Figshare. To prepare for the data migration we have paused adding new content to ePrints, and will resume once the new repository is launched. During this time you will continue to have access to ePrints (but no new content will appear). We will share updates here when available.

Verification imaging in prostate MR-only radiotherapy: Are fiducial markers necessary?

Lookup NU author(s): Dr Rachel Pearson, JJ Wyatt

Downloads


Licence

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).


Abstract

© 2024 The Authors. Purpose/objective: MR-only radiotherapy planning exploits the benefits of MRI soft-tissue delineation, whilst negating the registration inaccuracies caused by MRI CT fusion. Fiducial markers have conventionally been used in prostate radiotherapy to reduce on-treatment image matching variability. However, this is an invasive procedure for the patient, and presents technical difficulties in an MR-only pathway as fiducial markers are difficult to visualise on MRI. This study compares MR-CBCT soft-tissue matching to fiducial matching in an MR-only prostate pathway. Material/methods: Four therapeutic radiographers reviewed first fraction CBCTs for 25 patients. The CBCT was compared to the planning MRI, a T2 weighted sequence for the soft-tissue match and compared to a T1 weighted MRI sequence for the fiducial match. Inter-observer variability was quantified using the inter-observer error and 95 % limits of agreement from a modified Bland-Altman analysis. Accuracy of the soft-tissue match was quantified by calculating the difference from the fiducial match. Results: Limits of agreement on the MR soft-tissue match were 1.5 mm, 4.0 mm, 3.5 mm and fiducial match 2.5 mm, 3.6 mm, 2.5 mm (lateral, longitudinal, vertical). Inter-observer error (±standard deviation) on the MR soft-tissue match were 0.6(±0.5) mm, 1.8(±1.1) mm, 1.7(±0.7) mm and fiducial match 0.7(±1.1) mm, 1.1(±1.5) mm, 0.8(±0.7) mm (lateral, longitudinal, vertical). The difference of the soft-tissue match from the fiducial match was 0.3(±1.1) mm, −0.1(±2.7) mm, 0.1(±1.9) mm (lateral, longitudinal, vertical). Conclusion: MR-CBCT soft-tissue matching has similar accuracy and inter-observer variability as fiducial matching. This suggests fiducial markers are not necessary in an MR-only prostate radiotherapy pathway. Implications for practice: MR-only prostate radiotherapy does not require fiducial markers since MR-CBCT soft tissue matching can be used for IGRT.


Publication metadata

Author(s): Brooks-Pearson RL, Pearson RA, O'Connor L, Skehan K, Redding D, Wilkins E, Taylor S, Wyatt JJ

Publication type: Article

Publication status: Published

Journal: Radiography

Year: 2025

Volume: 31

Issue: 1

Pages: 333-340

Print publication date: 01/01/2025

Online publication date: 27/12/2024

Acceptance date: 11/12/2024

Date deposited: 06/01/2025

ISSN (print): 1078-8174

ISSN (electronic): 1532-2831

Publisher: W.B. Saunders Ltd

URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2024.12.010

DOI: 10.1016/j.radi.2024.12.010


Altmetrics

Altmetrics provided by Altmetric


Funding

Funder referenceFunder name
Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust Charity

Share