Toggle Main Menu Toggle Search

Open Access padlockePrints

The Newcastle University research output collection, currently available on ePrints, will shortly be moving to a new open repository platform, Figshare. To prepare for the data migration we have paused adding new content to ePrints, and will resume once the new repository is launched. During this time you will continue to have access to ePrints (but no new content will appear). We will share updates here when available.

Association between individual level characteristics and take-up of a Minimum Income Guarantee for Pensioners: Panel Data Analysis using data from the British Household Panel survey 1999–2002

Lookup NU author(s): Dr Viviana AlbaniORCiD

Downloads


Licence

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).


Abstract

© 2024 The AuthorsA Minimum Income Guarantee (MIG) ensures people have a minimum amount of income for essentials such as healthy food, housing, health care, social and digital networks to support health and well-being. MIGs could be a useful tool to reduce inequalities. A MIG will only be effective if those who are eligible take it up. The aim of this paper is to explore how individual characteristics were associated with take-up of a MIG for pensioners (aged 60+ for women and aged 65+ for men) in England. The data used is from the British Household Panel Survey including 9430 observations from 1893 people, from 1999 to 2002. We estimated a random effects logistic regression. Results show that women were less likely to claim than men (OR ranging from 0.17 [95% CI 0.10–0.29]-0.73 [95% CI 0.40–1.34]), and couples were less likely to claim (OR ranging from 0.04 [95% CI 0.03–0.06]-0.01 [95%CI 0.01–0.02]) than single person households. People with better mental health (OR 1.05 95% CI 1.02–1.08), older pensioners (75+) (OR ranging from 1.98 [95% CI 1.52–2.59]-2.81 [95%CI 2.16–3.67]), those who were registered disabled (OR 4.03 95% CI 2.50–6.52), and those with no formal qualification (OR ranging from 1.74 [95%CI 0.93–3.26]-2.07 [95% CI 1.22–3.51]) were more likely to claim. Understanding who is likely to claim MIGs is important to avoid social security policy inadvertently increasing inequalities.


Publication metadata

Author(s): Brown H, Albani V, Munford L, Sutton M, McHardy F, Silverman E, Richiardi M, Pearce A, Heppenstall A, Meier P, Thomson R, Katikireddi S

Publication type: Article

Publication status: Published

Journal: Social Sciences and Humanities Open

Year: 2024

Volume: 9

Online publication date: 17/02/2024

Acceptance date: 07/02/2024

Date deposited: 05/03/2024

ISSN (electronic): 2590-2911

Publisher: Elsevier Ltd

URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2024.100847

DOI: 10.1016/j.ssaho.2024.100847


Altmetrics

Altmetrics provided by Altmetric


Share