Toggle Main Menu Toggle Search

Open Access padlockePrints

The Newcastle University research output collection, currently available on ePrints, will shortly be moving to a new open repository platform, Figshare. To prepare for the data migration we have paused adding new content to ePrints, and will resume once the new repository is launched. During this time you will continue to have access to ePrints (but no new content will appear). We will share updates here when available.

Development and validation of a machine learning-supported strategy of patient selection for osteoarthritis clinical trials

Lookup NU author(s): Dr Paweł WideraORCiD, Dr Samuel Danso, Professor John LoughlinORCiD, Professor Jaume BacarditORCiD

Downloads


Licence

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND).


Abstract

Objectives: To efficiently assess the disease-modifying potential of new osteoarthritis treatments, clinical trials need progression-enriched patient populations. To assess whether the application of machine learning results in patient selection enrichment, we developed a machine learning recruitment strategy targeting progressive patients and validated it in the IMI-APPROACH knee osteoarthritis prospective study.Design: We designed a two-stage recruitment process supported by machine learning models trained to rank candidates by the likelihood of progression. First stage models used data from pre-existing cohorts to select patients for a screening visit. The second stage model used screening data to inform the final inclusion. The effectiveness of this process was evaluated using the actual 24-month progression.Results: From 3500 candidate patients, 433 with knee osteoarthritis were screened, 297 were enrolled, and 247 completed the 2-year follow-up visit. We observed progression related to pain (P, 30%), structure (S, 13%), and combined pain and structure (P ​+ ​S, 5%), and a proportion of non-progressors (N, 52%) ∼15% lower vs an unenriched population. Our model predicted these outcomes with AUC of 0.86 [95% CI, 0.81-0.90] for pain-related progression and AUC of 0.61 [95% CI, 0.52-0.70] for structure-related progression. Progressors were ranked higher than non-progressors for P ​+ ​S (median rank 65 vs 143, AUC = 0.75), P (median rank 77 vs 143, AUC = 0.71), and S patients (median rank 107 vs 143, AUC = 0.57).Conclusions: The machine learning-supported recruitment resulted in enriched selection of progressive patients. Further research is needed to improve structural progression prediction and assess this strategy in an interventional trial.


Publication metadata

Author(s): Widera P, Welsing PMJ, Danso SO, Peelen S, Kloppenburg M, Loef M, Marijnissen AC, vanHelvoort EM, Blanco FJ, Magalhaes J, Berenbaum F, Haugen IK, Bay-Jensen AC, Mobasheri A, Ladel C, Loughlin J, Lafeber FPJG, Lalande A, Larkin J, Weinans H, Bacardit J

Publication type: Article

Publication status: Published

Journal: Osteoarthritis Cartilage Open

Year: 2023

Volume: 5

Issue: 4

Print publication date: 01/12/2023

Online publication date: 18/08/2023

Acceptance date: 13/08/2023

Date deposited: 31/08/2023

ISSN (electronic): 2665-9131

Publisher: Elsevier Ltd

URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocarto.2023.100406

DOI: 10.1016/j.ocarto.2023.100406

PubMed id: 37649530


Altmetrics

Altmetrics provided by Altmetric


Share