Toggle Main Menu Toggle Search

Open Access padlockePrints

The Newcastle University research output collection, currently available on ePrints, will shortly be moving to a new open repository platform, Figshare. To prepare for the data migration we have paused adding new content to ePrints, and will resume once the new repository is launched. During this time you will continue to have access to ePrints (but no new content will appear). We will share updates here when available.

Language specific dual-task effects after stroke: A systematic review

Lookup NU author(s): Dr Christos SalisORCiD, Rawand Jarrar

Downloads


Licence

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).


Abstract

Purpose: The dual-task paradigm has been frequently used to examine stroke-related deficits because it samples behavioural performance under conditions of distraction similar to functioning in real-life environments. This original systematic review synthesizes of studies that examined dual-task effects involving spoken language production in adults affected by stroke, including transient ischaemic attack (TIA) and post-stroke aphasia. Method: Five databases were searched (inception to March 2022) for eligible peer-reviewed articles. The 21 included studies reported a total of 561 stroke participants. Thirteen studies focused on single word production, e.g., word fluency, and eight on discourse production, e.g., storytelling. Most studies included participants who had suffered a major stroke. Six studies focused on aphasia, whereas no study focused on TIA. A meta-analysis was not appropriate because of the heterogeneity of outcome measures. Results: Some single word production studies found dual-task language effects whereas others did not. This finding was compounded by the lack of appropriate control participants. Most single word and discourse studies utilised motoric tasks in the dual-task condition. Our certainty (or confidence) assessment was based on a methodological appraisal of each study and information about reliability/fidelity. As 10 of the 21 studies included appropriate control groups and limited reliability/fidelity information, the certainty of the findings may be described as weak. Conclusions: Language-specific dual-task costs were identified in single word studies, especially those that focused on aphasia as well as half of the non-aphasia studies. Unlike single word studies, nearly all studies of discourse showed dual-task decrements on at least some variables.


Publication metadata

Author(s): Salis C, Jarrar R, Murray L

Publication type: Article

Publication status: Published

Journal: Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research

Year: 2023

Volume: 66

Issue: 8

Pages: 2858-2883

Print publication date: 01/08/2023

Online publication date: 07/07/2023

Acceptance date: 11/04/2023

Date deposited: 13/11/2023

ISSN (print): 1092-4388

ISSN (electronic): 1558-9102

Publisher: American Speech-Language-Hearing Association

URL: https://doi.org/10.1044/2023_JSLHR-23-00006

DOI: 10.1044/2023_JSLHR-23-00006

ePrints DOI: 10.57711/hpqx-2m73

Data Access Statement: The original data are available from the corresponding author

PubMed id: 37418751


Altmetrics

Altmetrics provided by Altmetric


Share