Toggle Main Menu Toggle Search

Open Access padlockePrints

The Newcastle University research output collection, currently available on ePrints, will shortly be moving to a new open repository platform, Figshare. To prepare for the data migration we have paused adding new content to ePrints, and will resume once the new repository is launched. During this time you will continue to have access to ePrints (but no new content will appear). We will share updates here when available.

Response adaptive intervention allocation in stepped-wedge cluster randomized trials

Lookup NU author(s): Dr Michael GraylingORCiD, Professor James WasonORCiD

Downloads


Licence

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).


Abstract

© 2022 The Authors. Statistics in Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. Background: Stepped-wedge cluster randomized trial (SW-CRT) designs are often used when there is a desire to provide an intervention to all enrolled clusters, because of a belief that it will be effective. However, given there should be equipoise at trial commencement, there has been discussion around whether a pre-trial decision to provide the intervention to all clusters is appropriate. In pharmaceutical drug development, a solution to a similar desire to provide more patients with an effective treatment is to use a response adaptive (RA) design. Methods: We introduce a way in which RA design could be incorporated in an SW-CRT, permitting modification of the intervention allocation during the trial. The proposed framework explicitly permits a balance to be sought between power and patient benefit considerations. A simulation study evaluates the methodology. Results: In one scenario, for one particular RA design, the proportion of cluster-periods spent in the intervention condition was observed to increase from 32.2% to 67.9% as the intervention effect was increased. A cost of this was a 6.2% power drop compared to a design that maximized power by fixing the proportion of time in the intervention condition at 45.0%, regardless of the intervention effect. Conclusions: An RA approach may be most applicable to settings for which the intervention has substantial individual or societal benefit considerations, potentially in combination with notable safety concerns. In such a setting, the proposed methodology may routinely provide the desired adaptability of the roll-out speed, with only a small cost to the study's power.


Publication metadata

Author(s): Grayling MJ, Wason JMS, Villar SS

Publication type: Article

Publication status: Published

Journal: Statistics in Medicine

Year: 2022

Volume: 41

Issue: 6

Pages: 1081-1099

Print publication date: 15/03/2022

Online publication date: 21/01/2022

Acceptance date: 22/12/2021

Date deposited: 03/03/2022

ISSN (print): 0277-6715

ISSN (electronic): 1097-0258

Publisher: John Wiley and Sons Ltd

URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.9317

DOI: 10.1002/sim.9317


Altmetrics

Altmetrics provided by Altmetric


Funding

Funder referenceFunder name
MC_UU_00002/15
MC_UU_00002/6

Share