Toggle Main Menu Toggle Search

Open Access padlockePrints

The Newcastle University research output collection, currently available on ePrints, will shortly be moving to a new open repository platform, Figshare. To prepare for the data migration we have paused adding new content to ePrints, and will resume once the new repository is launched. During this time you will continue to have access to ePrints (but no new content will appear). We will share updates here when available.

Evaluation of the economic feasibility of a two-stage gasification system for hydrogen, liquid fuels and energy production from residues

Lookup NU author(s): Dr Hannah Kargbo, Professor Anh Phan

Downloads


Licence

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND).


Abstract

© 2021. Although two-stage gasifier design offers a number of advantages i.e., producing high-quality gas (high H2 content, low CO2 and other impurities) and tolerating high degree of heterogeneity of feedstock, its economic feasibility is yet to be evaluated. In this study, a techno-economic assessment is fully conducted to assess the economic feasibility of a two-stage gasification system for three routes: hydrogen production, liquid fuels via Fischer-Tropsch synthesis, and electricity production from biomass. For a two-stage gasification of 20 years at a plant size of 1000 dry t/d, the total capital investment for hydrogen, FT-liquid and electricity production are US $214.8 million, US $345.5 million and US $307 million with operating costs of US $35.6 million/y, US $62.2 million/y and US $48.6 million/y, respectively. The minimum selling price for hydrogen (at a pressure of 70 bar) and liquid fuel from biomass is comparable to that from fossil fuels (US $1.59/kg for H2 and US $1,109/m3 for liquid fuel) whereas for electricity (US $ 0.09/kWh), it is around half of the current electricity price from the grid in the UK. Comparing to conventional fluidised bed gasification for the same feedstock, around 25% cost reduction can be achieved for either hydrogen or liquid fuel production but only around 10% reduction for electricity. The results also show that the economics of the system can be improved further by 35–40% if the cost of feedstock is reduced by 30–50% at large-scale production facility (≥2000 dry t/d).


Publication metadata

Author(s): Kargbo HO, Ng KS, Phan AN

Publication type: Article

Publication status: Published

Journal: Energy Conversion and Management

Year: 2022

Volume: 253

Print publication date: 01/02/2022

Online publication date: 25/12/2021

Acceptance date: 08/12/2021

Date deposited: 07/03/2022

ISSN (print): 0196-8904

ISSN (electronic): 1879-2227

Publisher: Elsevier Ltd

URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2021.115126

DOI: 10.1016/j.enconman.2021.115126


Altmetrics

Altmetrics provided by Altmetric


Funding

Funder referenceFunder name
EPSRC IAA
LCS-2018-603

Share