Toggle Main Menu Toggle Search

Open Access padlockePrints

The Newcastle University research output collection, currently available on ePrints, will shortly be moving to a new open repository platform, Figshare. To prepare for the data migration we have paused adding new content to ePrints, and will resume once the new repository is launched. During this time you will continue to have access to ePrints (but no new content will appear). We will share updates here when available.

Efficacy and safety of iGlarLixi versus IDegAsp: Results of a systematic literature review and indirect treatment comparison

Lookup NU author(s): Emeritus Professor Philip Home

Downloads


Licence

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0).


Abstract

© 2021 The Authors. Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.Aim: To assess the efficacy and safety of iGlarLixi, a fixed-ratio combination of basal insulin glargine 100 U/mL and lixisenatide (glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist) versus IDegAsp, a co-formulation of basal insulin degludec 100 U/mL with rapid-acting insulin aspart. Materials and Methods: A systematic literature search of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was performed. Outcomes from eligible RCTs were compared by an indirect treatment comparison using a Bayesian framework. Subanalyses of Japanese and international trials were performed. Results: Eight RCTs (duration 26-30 weeks) were included. Mean difference in HbA1c change with iGlarLixi exceeded that for IDegAsp: −0.64 (95% credible interval −1.01, −0.28) %-units (−7.0 [−11.0, −3.1] mmol/mol) for all trials, −0.39 (−0.55, −0.23) %-units (−4.3 [−6.0, −2.5] mmol/mol) for international, and −0.88 (−1.11, −0.64) %-units (−9.6 [−12.1, −7.0] mmol/mol) for Japanese trials. HbA1c target achievement (<7.0%-units [<53 mmol/mol]) was greater for iGlarLixi in all trials (odds ratio 2.50 [1.06, 5.56]) and Japanese trials (2.17 [1.27, 3.70]), but not in international trials (2.17 [0.42, 11.11]). Analyses suggesting differences in mean postmeal self-measured plasma glucose were significantly lower by 1.0-2.0 mmol/L (18-36 mg/dL) with iGlarLixi in all analyses. Bodyweight change was more favourable (1-2 kg) for iGlarLixi versus IDegAsp for all analyses (P < 0.05). Comparisons of hypoglycaemia were inconclusive owing to differences in definitions between studies. Adverse events were more frequent with iGlarLixi because of gastrointestinal intolerance. Conclusions: iGlarLixi appears to offer clinical benefit in glucose control and bodyweight change in people needing both basal and meal-time intervention.


Publication metadata

Author(s): Home PD, Mehta R, Hafidh KAS, Gurova OY, Alvarez A, Serafini P, Pourrahmat M-M

Publication type: Article

Publication status: Published

Journal: Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism

Year: 2021

Volume: 23

Issue: 12

Pages: 2660-2669

Print publication date: 01/12/2021

Online publication date: 16/08/2021

Acceptance date: 03/08/2021

Date deposited: 13/09/2021

ISSN (print): 1462-8902

ISSN (electronic): 1463-1326

Publisher: John Wiley and Sons Inc

URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/dom.14518

DOI: 10.1111/dom.14518


Altmetrics

Altmetrics provided by Altmetric


Share