Toggle Main Menu Toggle Search

Open Access padlockePrints

The Newcastle University research output collection, currently available on ePrints, will shortly be moving to a new open repository platform, Figshare. To prepare for the data migration we have paused adding new content to ePrints, and will resume once the new repository is launched. During this time you will continue to have access to ePrints (but no new content will appear). We will share updates here when available.

Comparison of volume guarantee and volume-controlled ventilation both using closed loop inspired oxygen in preterm infants: A randomised crossover study (CLIO-VG study)

Lookup NU author(s): Dr Vrinda Nair, Dr Mithilesh Lal, Dr Prakash Kannan Loganathan

Downloads

Full text for this publication is not currently held within this repository. Alternative links are provided below where available.


Abstract

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.Objective: The objective of this study was to compare two different modes of ventilation in maintaining oxygen saturation (SpO2) in target range (90%-95%) in ventilated preterm infants cared for with automatic control of oxygen delivery (A-FiO2). Design: A single-centre randomised crossover study. Settings: A level III neonatal intensive care unit. Patients: Preterm infants receiving mechanical ventilation and oxygen requirement >21%. Interventions: Volume guarantee (VG) vs volume controlled ventilation (VCV) modes with automatic oxygen control (A-FiO2). Outcomes: The primary outcome of this study was the proportion of time spent with oxygen saturations in the target range (90%-95%). Results: Nineteen preterm infants with a median gestation age 25 weeks (IQR: 24-28) and birth weight 685 g (IQR: 595-980) were enrolled in the study. There was no significant difference in primary outcome of median proportion of time spent in target saturation between the two arms (72% (57-81) in VG vs 75% (58-83) in VCV; p=0.98). There was no significant difference in the secondary outcomes of time spent in SpO2 <80% (0.03% vs 0.14%; p=0.51), time spent in SpO2 >98% (0.50% vs 0.08%; p=0.54), the median FiO2 (31% vs 29%; p=0.51) or manual adjustments carried out between VG and VCV, respectively. The number of episodes of prolonged hypoxaemia and hyperoxaemia were similar in the two groups. Conclusion: There was no significant difference in time spent in target SpO2 range between VG and VCV when A-FiO2 was used as the FiO2 controller in this crossover randomised control study. Trial registration number: NCT03865069.


Publication metadata

Author(s): Nair V, Lal MK, Gillone J, Kannan Loganathan P, Bachman TE

Publication type: Article

Publication status: Published

Journal: Archives of Disease in Childhood: Fetal and Neonatal Edition

Year: 2021

Volume: 107

Issue: 2

Pages: 161-165

Online publication date: 07/07/2021

Acceptance date: 18/06/2021

ISSN (print): 1359-2998

ISSN (electronic): 1468-2052

Publisher: BMJ Publishing Group

URL: https://doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2021-321712

DOI: 10.1136/archdischild-2021-321712


Altmetrics

Altmetrics provided by Altmetric


Share