Toggle Main Menu Toggle Search

Open Access padlockePrints

The Newcastle University research output collection, currently available on ePrints, will shortly be moving to a new open repository platform, Figshare. To prepare for the data migration we have paused adding new content to ePrints, and will resume once the new repository is launched. During this time you will continue to have access to ePrints (but no new content will appear). We will share updates here when available.

Transitions between frailty states in the very old: the influence of socioeconomic status and multi-morbidity in the Newcastle 85+ cohort study

Lookup NU author(s): Dr Nuno Mendonca, Dr Andrew KingstonORCiD, Helen Hanson, Dr Rachel Duncan, Emerita Professor Carol Jagger, Dr Louise Robinson

Downloads


Licence

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).


Abstract

© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Geriatrics Society.BACKGROUND: Using Newcastle 85+ Study data, we investigated transitions between frailty states from age 85 to 90 years and whether multi-morbidities and socioeconomic status (SES) modify transitions. METHODS: The Newcastle 85+ Study is a prospective, longitudinal cohort study of all people born in 1921 in Newcastle and North Tyneside. Data included: a multidimensional health assessment; general practice record review (GPRR) and date of death. Using the Fried phenotype (participants defined as robust, pre-frail or frail), frailty was measured at baseline, 18, 36 and 60 months. RESULTS: Frailty scores were available for 82% (696/845) of participants at baseline. The prevalence of frailty was higher in women (29.7%, 123/414) than men (17.7%, 50/282) at baseline and all subsequent time points. Of those robust at baseline, 44.6% (50/112) remained robust at 18 months and 28% (14/50) at age 90. Most (52%) remained in the same state across consecutive interviews; only 6% of the transitions were recovery (from pre-frail to robust or frail to pre-frail), and none were from frail to robust. Four or more diseases inferred a greater likelihood of progression from robust to pre-frail even after adjustment for SES. SES did not influence the likelihood of moving from one frailty state to another. CONCLUSIONS: Almost half the time between age 85 and 90, on average, was spent in a pre-frail state; multi-morbidity increased the chance of progression from robust and to frail; greater clinical intervention at the onset of a first chronic illness, to prevent transition to multi-morbidity, should be encouraged.


Publication metadata

Author(s): Mendonca N, Kingston A, Yadegarfar M, Hanson H, Duncan R, Jagger C, Robinson L

Publication type: Article

Publication status: Published

Journal: Age and Ageing

Year: 2020

Volume: 49

Issue: 6

Pages: 974-981

Online publication date: 28/04/2020

Acceptance date: 02/04/2016

Date deposited: 09/11/2020

ISSN (print): 0002-0729

ISSN (electronic): 1468-2834

Publisher: Oxford University Press

URL: https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afaa054

DOI: 10.1093/ageing/afaa054

PubMed id: 32342980


Altmetrics

Altmetrics provided by Altmetric


Funding

Funder referenceFunder name
British Heart Foundation (PG/08/026/24712)
Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
Medical Research Council (G0500997, G0601333, MR/J50001X/1)
National Health Service or the Department of Health.

Share