Toggle Main Menu Toggle Search

Open Access padlockePrints

The Newcastle University research output collection, currently available on ePrints, will shortly be moving to a new open repository platform, Figshare. To prepare for the data migration we have paused adding new content to ePrints, and will resume once the new repository is launched. During this time you will continue to have access to ePrints (but no new content will appear). We will share updates here when available.

The sensitivity of differential ratings of perceived exertion as measures of internal load

Lookup NU author(s): Dr Iain SpearsORCiD

Downloads

Full text for this publication is not currently held within this repository. Alternative links are provided below where available.


Abstract

©2016 Human Kinetics,Inc.Purpose: To investigate the sensitivity of differential ratings of perceived exertion (dRPE) as measures of internal load. Methods: Twenty-two male university soccer players performed 2 maximal incremental-exercise protocols (cycle, treadmill) on separate days. Maximal oxygen uptake (VO2max), maximal heart rate (HRmax), peak blood lactate concentration (B[La]peak), and the preprotocol-to-postprotocol change in countermovement-jump height (ΔCMJH) were measured for each protocol. Players provided dRPE (CR100) for breathlessness (RPE-B) and leg-muscle exertion (RPE-L) immediately on exercise termination (RPE-B0, RPE-L0 ) and 30 min postexercise (RPE-B30, RPE-L30). Data were analyzed using magnitude-based inferences. Results: There were clear between-protocols differences for VO2max (cycle 46.5 ±} 6.3 vs treadmill 51.0 ±} 5.1 mL kg-1 min-1, mean difference -9.2%; ±}90% confidence limits 3.7%), HRmax (184.7 ±} 12.7 vs 196.7 ±} 7.8 beats/min, -6.0%; ±}1.7%), B[La]peak (9.7 ±} 2.1 vs 8.5 ±} 2.0 mmol/L, 15%; ±}10%), and ΔCMJH (-7.1 ±} 4.2 vs 0.6 ±} 3.6 cm, -23.2%; ±}5.4%). Clear between-protocols differences were recorded for RPE-B0 (78.0 ±} 11.7 vs 94.7 ±} 9.5 AU, -18.1%; ±}4.5%), RPE-L0 (92.6 ±} 9.7 vs 81.3 ±} 14.1 AU, 15.3%; ±}7.6%), RPE-B30 (70 ±} 11 vs 82 ±} 13 AU, -13.8%; ±}7.3%), and RPE-L30 (86 ±} 12 vs 65 ±} 19 AU, 37%; ±}17%). A substantial timing effect was observed for dRPE, with moderate to large reductions in all scores 30 min postexercise compared with scores collected on exercise termination. Conclusion: dRPE enhance the precision of internal-load measurement and therefore represent a worthwhile addition to training-load-monitoring procedures.


Publication metadata

Author(s): Mclaren SJ, Graham M, Spears IR, Weston M

Publication type: Article

Publication status: Published

Journal: International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance

Year: 2016

Volume: 11

Issue: 3

Pages: 404-406

Print publication date: 01/04/2016

Acceptance date: 01/01/1900

ISSN (print): 1555-0265

ISSN (electronic): 1555-0273

Publisher: Human Kinetics Publishers Inc.

URL: https://doi.org/10.1123/ijspp.2015-0223

DOI: 10.1123/ijspp.2015-0223

PubMed id: 26218099


Altmetrics

Altmetrics provided by Altmetric


Share