Toggle Main Menu Toggle Search

Open Access padlockePrints

The Newcastle University research output collection, currently available on ePrints, will shortly be moving to a new open repository platform, Figshare. To prepare for the data migration we have paused adding new content to ePrints, and will resume once the new repository is launched. During this time you will continue to have access to ePrints (but no new content will appear). We will share updates here when available.

Codesigning health and other public services with vulnerable and disadvantaged populations: Insights from an international collaboration

Lookup NU author(s): Melissa Girling

Downloads

Full text for this publication is not currently held within this repository. Alternative links are provided below where available.

Abstract

© 2019 The Authors. Health Expectations published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.Background: Codesign has the potential to transform health and other public services. To avoid unintentionally reinforcing existing inequities, better understanding is needed of how to facilitate involvement of vulnerable populations in acceptable, ethical and effective codesign. Objective: To explore citizens’ involvement in codesigning public services for vulnerable groups, identify challenges and suggest improvements. Design: A modified case study approach. Pattern matching was used to compare reported challenges with a priori theoretical propositions. Setting and participants: A two-day international symposium involved 28 practitioners, academics and service users from seven countries to reflect on challenges and to codesign improved processes for involving vulnerable populations. Intervention studied: Eight case studies working with vulnerable and disadvantaged populations in three countries. Results: We identified five shared challenges to meaningful, sustained participation of vulnerable populations: engagement; power differentials; health concerns; funding; and other economic/social circumstances. In response, a focus on relationships and flexibility is essential. We encourage codesign projects to enact a set of principles or heuristics rather than following pre-specified steps. We identify a set of principles and tactics, relating to challenges outlined in our case studies, which may help in codesigning public services with vulnerable populations. Discussion and conclusions: Codesign facilitators must consider how meaningful engagement will be achieved and how power differentials will be managed when working with services for vulnerable populations. The need for flexibility and responsiveness to service user needs may challenge expectations about timelines and outcomes. User-centred evaluations of codesigned public services are needed.

Publication metadata

Author(s): Mulvale G, Moll S, Miatello A, Robert G, Larkin M, Palmer VJ, Powell A, Gable C, Girling M

Publication type: Review

Publication status: Published

Journal: Health Expectations

Year: 2019

Volume: 22

Issue: 3

Pages: 284-297

Print publication date: 01/06/2019

Online publication date: 02/01/2019

Acceptance date: 11/12/2018

ISSN (print): 1369-6513

ISSN (electronic): 1369-7625

Publisher: Blackwell Publishing Ltd

URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/hex.12864

DOI: 10.1111/hex.12864

Share