Toggle Main Menu Toggle Search

Open Access padlockePrints

The Newcastle University research output collection, currently available on ePrints, will shortly be moving to a new open repository platform, Figshare. To prepare for the data migration we have paused adding new content to ePrints, and will resume once the new repository is launched. During this time you will continue to have access to ePrints (but no new content will appear). We will share updates here when available.

Use of infliximab biosimilar versus originator in a pediatric United Kingdom inflammatory bowel disease induction cohort

Lookup NU author(s): Dr Su Bunn

Downloads

Full text for this publication is not currently held within this repository. Alternative links are provided below where available.


Abstract

Copyright © 2018 by European Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition and North American Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition Objectives: The aim of the study was to summarize short-term effectiveness, safety, and cost of using infliximab biosimilar (IFX-B) drugs, (Inflectra [Hospira] and Remsima [NAAP]) compared to originator infliximab (IFX-O) (Remicade [MSD]) in biologic naive pediatric inflammatory bowel disease in the United Kingdom. Methods: Prospective audit of patients starting anti-tumour necrosis factor (TNF) therapy. Disease severity, response to treatment, and remission rate was measured by Pediatric Crohn's Disease Activity Index (PCDAI) and/or Physician Global Assessment. Results: Between March 2015 and February 2016, 278 patients (175 IFX-O, 82 IFX-B, and 21 Adalimumab) were started on anti-TNF therapy. This was compared with collected data on 398 patients started on IFX-O from 2011 to 2015. At initiation, median PCDAI was 36 (20,48) (n ¼ 42) in the IFX-O group and 28 (20,40) (n ¼ 29) in the IFX-B group, (P ¼ 0.08). Immunosuppression rates were similar: 150/175 (86%) for IFX-O and 65/82 (79%) for IFX-B (P > 0.05). Post induction, median PCDAI score was 5 (0,11) (n ¼ 19) and 0 (0,8) (n ¼ 15) in the IFX-O and IFX-B groups, respectively (P ¼ 0.35). There was no difference in response to treatment using Physician Global Assessment 85% (n ¼ 28) in IFX-O group and 86% (n ¼ 19) in IFX-B group (P > 0.05). Adverse events at initiation and post induction were not different between both groups (P > 0.05). Using conservative calculations, £875,000 would have been saved for a 1-year period with universal adoption of biosimilars in patients who were instead treated with IFX-O. Conclusions: IFX-B is likely as effective as IFX-O in treating IBD in comparable pediatric populations. Sites should adopt infliximab biosimilar for new starts due to cost reduction with no difference in other parameters.


Publication metadata

Author(s): Chanchlani N, Mortier K, Williams LJ, Muhammed R, Auth MKH, Cosgrove M, Fagbemi A, Fell J, Chong S, Zamvar V, Hyer W, Michael Bisset W, Morris M-A, Rodrigues A, Mitton SG, Bunn S, Mark Beattie R, Willmott A, Wilson DC, Russell RK

Publication type: Article

Publication status: Published

Journal: Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition

Year: 2018

Volume: 67

Issue: 4

Pages: 513-519

Print publication date: 01/10/2018

Online publication date: 01/10/2018

Acceptance date: 02/04/2016

ISSN (print): 0277-2116

ISSN (electronic): 1536-4801

Publisher: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins

URL: https://doi.org/10.1097/MPG.0000000000002011

DOI: 10.1097/MPG.0000000000002011

PubMed id: 29697550


Altmetrics

Altmetrics provided by Altmetric


Share