Toggle Main Menu Toggle Search

Open Access padlockePrints

The Newcastle University research output collection, currently available on ePrints, will shortly be moving to a new open repository platform, Figshare. To prepare for the data migration we have paused adding new content to ePrints, and will resume once the new repository is launched. During this time you will continue to have access to ePrints (but no new content will appear). We will share updates here when available.

Health professionals’ and managers' definitions of developmentally appropriate healthcare for young people: conceptual dimensions and embedded controversies

Lookup NU author(s): Dr Victoria Wood, Professor Jeremy ParrORCiD, Dr Tim Rapley

Downloads


Licence

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0).


Abstract

Objectives: We aimed to (i) explore how health professionals and managers who work with young people seek to define developmentally appropriate healthcare (DAH); (ii) identify the range of conceptual dimensions present in their definitions; and (iii) explore the controversies embedded in their characterisations of DAH. Methods: A qualitative multi-site ethnographic study was conducted across three hospitals in England. We undertook: non-participant observations in clinics, wards and meetings; and formal face-to-face semi-structured one-off interviews with some health professionals and managers and serial interviews with others. Data underwent thematic analysis. The theme ‘conceptualisations of DAH’ was then further coded; codes were collated into themes; and themes categorised to form conceptual dimensions. Results: 192 participants were recruited. 65 interviews (41 with health professionals and 24 with managers) and approximately 1600 hours of non-participant observations (involving 103 health professionals and 72 managers) were conducted. Despite the wide range of definitions provided by participants, five conceptual dimensions of DAH were identified: (i) bio-psycho-social development and holistic care; (ii) acknowledgement of young people as a distinct group; (iii) adjustment of care as the young person develops; (iv) empowerment of the young person by embedding health education and health promotion; and (v) interdisciplinary and inter-organisational work. Also, some controversies were identified within most dimensions. Conclusions: This study illustrates the lack of a generalised definition of DAH for young people among UK health professionals and managers, and presents a set of five core dimensions that can inform future research to help define and evaluate DAH for young people.


Publication metadata

Author(s): Farre A, Wood V, McDonagh JE, Parr J, Reape D, Rapley T

Publication type: Article

Publication status: Published

Journal: Archives of Disease in Childhood

Year: 2016

Volume: 101

Issue: 7

Pages: 628-633

Print publication date: 01/07/2016

Online publication date: 04/03/2016

Acceptance date: 14/02/2016

Date deposited: 06/05/2016

ISSN (print): 0003-9888

ISSN (electronic): 1468-2044

Publisher: BMJ Group

URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2015-309473

DOI: 10.1136/archdischild-2015-309473


Altmetrics

Altmetrics provided by Altmetric


Funding

Funder referenceFunder name
RP-PG-0610-10112National Institute for Health Research (NIHR)

Share