Toggle Main Menu Toggle Search

Open Access padlockePrints

The Newcastle University research output collection, currently available on ePrints, will shortly be moving to a new open repository platform, Figshare. To prepare for the data migration we have paused adding new content to ePrints, and will resume once the new repository is launched. During this time you will continue to have access to ePrints (but no new content will appear). We will share updates here when available.

Improving results for carotid artery stenting by validation of the anatomic scoring system for carotid artery stenting with patient-specific simulated rehearsal

Lookup NU author(s): Professor Gerard StansbyORCiD, Dr Sumaira MacDonald

Downloads

Full text for this publication is not currently held within this repository. Alternative links are provided below where available.


Abstract

Objective: Carotid artery stenting (CAS) is a technically demanding procedure with a risk of periprocedural stroke. A scoring system based on anatomic criteria has been developed to facilitate patient selection for CAS. Advancements in simulation science also enable case evaluation through patient-specific virtual reality (VR) rehearsal on an endovascular simulator. This study aimed to validate the anatomic scoring system for CAS using the patient-specific VR technology.Methods: Three patients were selected and graded according to the CAS scoring system (maximum score, 9): one easy (score, <4.9), one intermediate (score, 5.0-5.9), and one difficult (score, >7.0). The three cases were performed on the simulator in random order by 20 novice interventionalists pretrained in CAS. Technical performances were assessed using simulator-based metrics and expert-based ratings.Results: The interventionalists took significantly longer to perform the difficult CAS case (median, 31.6 vs 19.7 vs 14.6 minutes; P < .0001) compared with the intermediate and easy cases; similarly, more fluoroscopy time (20.7 vs 12.1 vs 8.2 minutes; P <. 0001), contrast volume (56.5 vs 51.5 vs 50.0 mL; P = .0060), and roadmaps (10 vs 9 vs 9; P = .0040) were used. The quality of performance declined significantly as the cases became more challenging (score, 24 vs 22 vs 19; P < .0001).Conclusions: The anatomic scoring system for CAS can predict the difficulty of a CAS procedure as measured by patient-specific VR. This scoring system, with or without the additional use of patient-specific VR, can guide novice interventionalists in selecting appropriate patients for CAS. This may reduce the perioperative stroke risk and enhance patient safety. (J Vasc Surg 2012;56:1763-70.)


Publication metadata

Author(s): Willaert WIM, Cheshire NJ, Aggarwal R, Van Herzeele I, Stansby G, Macdonald S, Vermassen FE, European Virtual Reality Endovascular Research Team (EVERest)

Publication type: Article

Publication status: Published

Journal: Journal of Vascular Surgery

Year: 2012

Volume: 56

Issue: 6

Pages: 1763-1770

Print publication date: 27/06/2012

ISSN (print): 0741-5214

ISSN (electronic): 1097-6809

Publisher: Mosby Inc.

URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2012.03.257

DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2012.03.257


Altmetrics

Altmetrics provided by Altmetric


Share