Toggle Main Menu Toggle Search

Open Access padlockePrints

The Newcastle University research output collection, currently available on ePrints, will shortly be moving to a new open repository platform, Figshare. To prepare for the data migration we have paused adding new content to ePrints, and will resume once the new repository is launched. During this time you will continue to have access to ePrints (but no new content will appear). We will share updates here when available.

Defining the foundation of lean manufacturing in the context of its origins (Japan)

Lookup NU author(s): Colin Herron, Professor Paul Braiden

Downloads

Full text for this publication is not currently held within this repository. Alternative links are provided below where available.

Abstract

Manufacturing companies in the west are preoccupied with a contest for survival with emerging economies. One of the established tools in the contest is lean manufacturing. This paper reports work with a recognised exemplar in lean manufacturing combined with a study visit to Japanese companies, which has identified a core of manufacturing best practice. This has, in turn, supported a regional research programme designed to increase productivity in general manufacturing. The outcomes of this programme lead to questions regarding current western thinking/writing with respect to the introduction of lean manufacturing, along with the associated tools/techniques. The result is three propositions; the central point is that the cultural difference between the original source of a concept and the intended recipient is a major factor in the potential success or failure of a change programme. The second is that the techniques of lean manufacturing are explicit but have become confused by re-classifications and the apparent desire in the west to present 'solution packages'. Typical packages include: Six-Sigma, theory of constraints, lean manufacturing and recently lean Six-sigma. A further proposition is that the imposition of 'solution packages' can be both confusing and potentially harmful. Whilst the basic tools of manufacturing best practice are discrete, for maximum benefit and sustainability they are dependent on each other, which is often not appreciated.

Publication metadata

Author(s): Herron C, Braiden P

Publication type: Conference Proceedings (inc. Abstract)

Publication status: Published

Conference Name: IET International Conference on Agile Manufacturing (ICAM 2007)

Year of Conference: 2007

Pages: 148-157

Publisher: Institution of Engineering and Technology

URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1049/cp:20070021

DOI: 10.1049/cp:20070021

Library holdings: Search Newcastle University Library for this item

ISBN: 9780863418167

Share